Would Hillary Clinton's Presidency Have Been Better Than Trump’s?

The 2020 U.S. presidential election was a crucial moment in American history. Many argued fervently that Hillary Clinton would have made a better president compared to Donald Trump. This debate revolves around the economic, social, and political issues that would have faced the country under a Clinton administration.

Economic Policies and Higher Minimum Wage

Those advocating for Hillary Clinton often cited her promises for a higher minimum wage and a more equitable economic system. If Clinton had been elected, one of the key changes could have been the implementation of a higher federal minimum wage. Proponents argue that this would help alleviate poverty and ensure a more stable middle class. Supporters also suggested that an increased minimum wage would stimulate the economy by putting more money in the hands of working Americans.

Covid-19 Pandemic Management

Kudos to Hillary Clinton for her apparent better way to handle the pandemic. She was praised for her approach to managing the crisis, which focused on preventive measures, testing, and a strong emphasis on public health. This stance was in stark contrast to Trump's more laissez-faire and sometimes controversial approach, which led to varied outcomes and significant disparities in public health outcomes across different regions.

Democratic Values and Threat of Insurrection

Advocates for a Clinton presidency were also critical of the Capitol Hill riot orchestrated by extremist groups linked to the Republican Party. They argued that Clinton’s leadership would have adhered more closely to democratic principles and would not have condoned or stoked such insurrectionary efforts. The repercussions of the Capitol insurrection, however, are still felt and serve as a sobering reminder of the importance of a check on excesses and a commitment to constitutional norms.

Age and Leadership in Times of Crisis

Some critics of Trump, and Hillary's supporters, argue that the age of a leader is not necessarily a deficit. Trump, being of a certain age, raised concerns about his ability to rapidly adapt to swiftly changing world events. Clinton, on the other hand, was seen as more seasoned and experienced in government, with a deep understanding of constitutional principles. Supporters of Clinton argued that her caution and respect for the constitution were more valuable qualities in navigating the complex challenges of leadership during times of rapid change.

Election Controversies and Suspicions

However, questions about the electoral process under Clinton's presidency cannot be ignored. Some pointed out that a Clinton presidency could have eradicated the sense of electoral fraud and manipulation that was rampant during Trump's tenure. Critics noted the electoral issues like over-counted votes in certain regions, which could easily sway the final outcome. These concerns fueled the narrative that the election results were not reflective of a legitimate popular vote, particularly in states with tight margins.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while many believe that Hillary Clinton would have made a better president, these beliefs are undoubtedly subjective. The 2020 election was marked by significant controversies and doubts. Regardless of who was elected, the American public and the rest of the world are left to analyze and learn from the choices made, and the challenges faced during this pivotal moment in history. The upcoming elections and the subsequent years will continue to shape the future of the United States.