Why Universities Refuse to Lower Tuition for Online Classes: Dispelling Common Myths
Universities are often asked to lower tuition for online classes, despite the fact that physical classroom facilities may not be in use. This article aims to clarify the reasons behind this decision and dispel common misconceptions about the cost and value of online education.
Unfounded Arguments for Lowering Tuition
The argument that tuition should be lowered for online classes is frequently posted on platforms like Quora. Many people believe that since professors are not physically present to lecture, the classes and credit hours should be discounted or even provided free of charge. However, there is no logical basis for this suggestion or conclusion.
The issue of below-par performance by students in online classes is often brought up by students. While it is understandable that some students may struggle with online coursework, their GPA issues are generally due to a lack of discipline and maturity. These factors are independent of whether classes are delivered online or in person.
Why Lowering Tuition is Not Feasible
The costs associated with maintaining online classes are often overlooked. Even without students physically attending classes, universities still incur significant expenses to continue offering courses online. This includes staff salaries, ongoing technology infrastructure, interest costs on loans used to build lecture theaters and laboratories, ground rent, rates, local taxes, water, sewage, gas, and electricity payments. Additionally, funding from campus-based operations, such as eating and drinking establishments, social events, and residence rentals, has been reduced due to the current situation.
Furthermore, the amount of rent from university-owned residences has decreased, leading to a substantial loss of income. Capital reserves that were previously used for maintenance and renovation projects have been depleted. Some universities may have had to make penalty payments to contractors and may even need to take out loans just to survive.
Despite the reduced student foot traffic, academic staff have actually had to work harder. The conversion of traditional lessons and assessments to online platforms has been a significant undertaking that would typically take years to achieve. Academic staff have been struggling to provide students with as much of an education as possible during a period of disruption.
As a result, the per student cost has increased, yet universities cannot simply increase fees.
Conclusion
Despite the challenges brought about by the shift to online learning, universities cannot offer significant tuition discounts. The costs associated with maintaining and enhancing online education are substantial and must be covered. It is essential to recognize the hard work and efforts of both faculty and staff in making this transition as smooth as possible for students.