The Shift in Putin's Relations with the West: A Deceptive Pro-Western Image
For many, the idea that Vladimir Putin had a pro-Western standing during his early years of leadership is a misnomer. While Putin outwardly portrayed himself as a pro-Western leader and a staunch democrat upon taking office, his actions from the beginning of his tenure were anything but democratic and pro-Western. This article delves into the deeper complexities and reveals how Putin's relationship with the West deteriorated over time.
The Deceptive Pro-Western Image
Upon his ascension to power, Vladimir Putin initially presented himself as a pro-Western leader. However, his claims were merely a facade. In August 2000, Putin stripped regional representatives of their seats in the Federation Council, an anti-democratic move that signaled the beginning of his authoritarian rule.
Less than a month later, in September 2000, Putin demanded that Boris Berezovsky, a prominent television host and media tycoon who had faced conflicts with Putin, sell his shares and step away from managing ORT. Berezovsky was forced to comply with this demand in January 2001. A similar fate befell another media owner, Vladimir Gusinsky. His NTV channel was acquired after he was arrested and forced to sign documents for its sale.
Control of Media and Regional Power
By the spring of 2001, the state had gained control of all television channels either directly or through compliant oligarchs. Regional powers had also been significantly diminished. At the same time, Putin maintained an image of commitment to democratic values during meetings with Western leaders, such as President George W. Bush.
These tactics are common among dictators. At the beginning of their rule, when their power is still weak, they hide their true intentions. For instance, in the 1920s, Joseph Stalin portrayed himself as a moderate while preparing for the purges and persecutions. Similarly, Adolf Hitler promised peace and equality in 1933, just before he initiated a series of anti-democratic actions.
The Turning Point: Realizaion of Betrayal
The turning point for Putin came when the West took actions that did not align with his interests. NATO's expansion into the Baltic states, the US withdrawal from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, deployment of new ABM systems in Central Europe, and the invasions of Iraq, despite Putin's objections, all contributed to a growing sense of betrayal. The Rose Revolution in Georgia in 2003 and the Orange Revolution in Ukraine in 2005, which thwarted the election of pro-Russian leaders, further strained Putin's relations with the West.
Ultimately, Putin realized that the West did not treat him with the respect and consideration he believed he deserved. This realization led to a significant shift in his approach to Western diplomacy, from one of friendliness and cooperation to one of suspicion and hostility.
Persuasive as Putin may have been in his early years, his actions from the outset provided a clear indication of his intentions. Understanding the shift in Putin's relationship with the West is crucial for comprehending the complex geopolitical landscape of today.
Conclusion
Vladimir Putin's early years in power were marked by a deceptive pro-Western image. His actions and policies betrayed this facade, leading to a significant breakdown in relations with the West. This article highlights the key turning points in his relationship and provides insights into the strategies used by dictators to maintain power.