The Secret Service and JFK’s Assassination: Did They Try to Stop Lee Harvey Oswald?

The Secret Service and JFK’s Assassination: Did They Try to Stop Lee Harvey Oswald?

The assassination of President John F. Kennedy remains one of the most controversial events in American history. Questions have long swirled around whether Lee Harvey Oswald was alone in the conspiracy, or if the U.S. Secret Service may have had a role. This article delves into the evidence that suggests a deeper involvement of the Secret Service in the tragic event.

The Secret Service's Role in Protecting the President

In the autumn of 1963, the Secret Service was tasked with ensuring the safety of President Kennedy during his visit to Dallas, Texas. Novice intern Abraham Bolden discovered a significant breach of protocol, revealing that multiple policies devised to protect the President were overwhelmingly violated. The protection policies, which strictly regulated the motorcade route, were disregarded in a manner that could be considered a serious lapse in security.

During the infamous Texas Depository event, Secret Service driver John Arnold Greer slowed the car down as it approached the kill zone. This action allowed the shooter, presumably Lee Harvey Oswald, to get a better shot at the president. The Secret Service's decision to back away from the car as it approached the targeted location raises suspicion.

Reports of Unusual Behavior

Unusual reports from the event add to the mystery. One Secret Service agent reportedly stated that if someone attempted to assassinate the president, he would do nothing to prevent it. Instead, he would simply turn a blind eye. Such a statement fuels the theory that the agency might have had ulterior motives or even facilitated the assassination.

Incriminating Evidence

Strong evidence suggests that the Secret Service might have been complicit in the assassination. In a controversial view, Secret Service agent John Arnold Greer turned around and possibly fired a small gun at the president, ensuring his death. The Zapruder film, which captured the event, has frames that show Greer's hand movements that are too quick to be humanly possible. Some theories propose that these frames were edited or deleted to hide the truth, suggesting that Greer either directly killed Kennedy or at least made sure he died if the shots from other sources did not.

In addition, the statement that the Secret Service blamed drunkenness for the events is viewed as a convenient cover-up. The question remains: were they simply negligent, or did they intentionally allow the assassination to occur? The lack of motive for Oswald to assassinate the president, as he supposedly admired him, adds another layer of complexity to the mystery.

The Blackboard Theory

The Blackboard Theory posits that powerful individuals in the U.S. government had long-standing plans to assassinate President Kennedy and needed to ensure a patsy for conspiracy purposes. This theory suggests that other factors, including the involvement of the Secret Service, played a crucial role in the assassination. The actions of the Secret Service, as highlighted by Abraham Bolden, become more significant in this context, indicating a premeditated and coordinated effort to ensure the president's death.

Conclusion

The assassination of President John F. Kennedy continues to captivate the public's imagination, and the involvement of the U.S. Secret Service remains a central question. The evidence and reports gathered highlight the potential complicity of the Secret Service in the tragic event. The questions raised by Abraham Bolden and the suspicious actions of Secret Service personnel during the assassination suggest a need for a thorough and independent investigation. Only through a clear understanding of the events can the truth be uncovered, ensuring that the lessons from one of the most significant events in American history are not forgotten.

Further reading and debunking of the Blackboard Theory can be found in reputable historical sources and research papers. Understanding the full scope of the events surrounding the assassination remains a critical aspect of American civics and politics.