The Pronunciation Dilemma of 'Processes' in American English
The English language is ever-evolving, and pronunciation can often vary based on regional dialect or personal preference. This article explores the correct pronunciation of the word "processes" in American English, including its usage in different contexts and how it compares to British English.
Beyond the Basics: Pronunciations in American English
The word "processes" can be pronounced in various ways among American English speakers. Generally, the primary differs between a long or short 'o' sound:
In American English
/prɑ.ss/ with a long o, /pr?.ss/ with a short o
The most common pronunciation in American English follows the pattern /pr?.ss/:
Most U.S. Americans would pronounce the 'o' in "processes" with a shorter sound, similar to the word "pruss." However, this can vary depending on the individual's regional accent or personal preference.
Is There a Standard Pronunciation?
While there is no universally "correct" way to pronounce "processes," the most common pronunciation is the one used in a particular speech community. For example:
According to Webster's Dictionary:
process - /pr-ses/ (american pronunciation) /prō- -ss/ (british pronunciation) processes - /pr-se-sz/ (american pronunciation) /prō- -s- -sēz/ (british pronunciation)
Dr. Seuss's phonetic spelling adds to the variety:
Dr. Seuss Notation: PRAH-ses, PROH-ses
Varied Pronunciations Around the World
The pronunciation of "processes" can vary not only between American and British English but also within American English itself. For instance:
American Pronunciation Variations:
The first syllable might be pronounced as in "prop" or as in "probe," depending on regional accent. Some speakers may use /prā.ss/ with a longer 'o,' while others may prefer /pr?.ss/ with a shorter 'o.'
There are also variants of pronunciation, such as:
IPA UK Pronunciation: /prssz/ or /prssz/
Etymologically, the word "process" traces back to the Latin "processus." However, modern English has adapted and changed meaning, pronunciation, and usage over time:
Etymology (Etymonline):
process n. - early 14c. processus (Latin constructio, action of putting together, processus, a going or proceeding, steps in a procedure) process v.1 - 1530s (literal)
Current Innovations in Pronunciation
Language is a dynamic system, and sometimes pronunciations can change based on common usage or personal preference. In the case of "processes," there have been new innovations, such as:
Incorrect but Common Innovations:
Some speakers use the final syllable -eez as though it were the plural of a Latin noun, such as "processis," on the model of "analysis-analyses." This pronunciation is seen as forwards but ahistorical in the sense that many English words have evolved from Latin or other languages.
However, it's important to note that what is perceived as an innovation or change in pronunciation is often part of the natural evolution of language. The pronunciation of "processes" is not set in stone and can vary based on region, social context, and personal preference:
Flexible Pronunciation: You may choose to say "process is" or "process ease" according to your preference or the speech community you are in. You might even use one pronunciation at home and another at work.
Conclusion
The pronunciation of "processes" continues to evolve, reflecting the dynamic nature of the English language. While there is no single, canonically correct pronunciation, the most commonly used forms are driven by usage within speech communities. Understanding and adapting to these varied pronunciations can help in effective communication across different regions and communities.