The Merits and Demerits of Rankiq Ranking System for SSC CGL 2020: A Critical Analysis
Introduction to SSC CGL 2020 and the Concept of Rankiq Ranking System.
The SSC Combined Graduate Level (CGL) Exam is a highly competitive recruitment examination conducted by the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) in India. With thousands of aspirants vying for a limited number of positions, accurate pre-evaluation of ranks can be quite beneficial. In this article, we will delve into a critical analysis of the Rankiq Ranking System, a tool that claims to estimate the ranks and scores of SSC CGL 2020 aspirants based on the live data submitted by the candidates.
Evaluation of the Rankiq Ranking System
Some individuals have expressed their admiration for the efforts behind the Rankiq Ranking System, highlighting its potential as a valuable resource for SSC CGL 2020 aspirants. However, a closer examination reveals both commendable aspects and significant limitations.
Positive Aspects of Rankiq Ranking System
The primary merit of the Rankiq system is its use of live data from aspirants, allowing candidates to gauge their relative performance. This feature can be particularly useful during the final stages of preparation, as it provides an approximate idea of where one stands. Additionally, the Rankiq system offers a medium to identify performance trends and areas that need improvement.
Negative Aspects of Rankiq Ranking System
Despite its potential, the Rankiq Ranking System is not without its flaws. One major issue is the lack of data filtering. The system does not filter out multiple entries from the same aspirant, which can lead to inflated ranks. This problem was recently highlighted by both the author and their friend, who found that providing the same data within a short span of time could result in a significant increase in the base of ranks. This inconsistency undermines the reliability of the results, making it difficult to accurately predict one's rank.
Reliability and Accuracy
While the Rankiq system claims to have sufficient data, the author and their friend have raised doubts about the validity of this claim. In a recent check, the system showed a rank based on approximately 22,000 aspirants; however, it was suspected that the actual number of unique applicants might be closer to 10,000. This discrepancy highlights the potential for inaccuracies in the ranking, making it essential for aspirants to remain cautious and not place undue reliance on such systems for exact predictions.
Conclusion and Final Thoughts
While the Rankiq Ranking System offers a valuable tool for SSC CGL 2020 aspirants, its accuracy and reliability remain questionable due to the lack of proper data filtering and potential data manipulation. As an aspirant, it is crucial to approach such systems with a critical mindset and to focus primarily on comprehensive preparation rather than relying solely on external tools. It is always advisable to stay updated with official sources and maintain a balanced approach to exam preparation.
Final thoughts and advice for aspirants:
For aspiring candidates preparing for the SSC CGL 2020, it is important to approach such ranking systems with a cautious mindset. While they can provide a general idea of one's performance, they should not be used as the sole basis for rank prediction. Instead, focus on consistent preparation, using official resources and reliable study materials for the best results. Remember, the key to success in the SSC CGL lies in thorough preparation and dedication.