The Long-Term Effects of Judge Kavanaugh's Confirmation to the U.S. Supreme Court
The confirmation of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court has sparked significant debate and has been a contentious political issue. This article explores the potential long-term effects of his confirmation on the future of the U.S. Supreme Court and the broader context of U.S. political and legal landscapes.
Impact on Democratic Process and Due Process
The confirmation battle of Judge Kavanaugh has revealed a deep divide in American politics. The manner in which the confirmation process unfolded has further exposed the tensions between political parties and the institutions they represent. Democrats have shown a willingness to use any means necessary to obstruct the confirmation process, a strategy aimed at embarrassing and discrediting the nominee. This has included public accusations that have no legal basis, which are likely to continue as a tactic in future nomination battles (American progressive left).
The American public has witnessed the political left's disregard for the due process of law and the rights of the accused. The recent Jan. 6th committee hearings have been a stark demonstration of this, where no legal ramifications have followed the political activism. This has eroded public trust in the legal system and the political process.
Shift in Judicial Philosophy
The confirmation of Judge Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court is expected to instigate a shift towards a more conservative judicial philosophy. As an originalist, Judge Kavanaugh is dedicated to applying the law as written rather than interpreting it flexibly. This approach is seen as a return to the principles of a constitutional republic, where the judiciary upholds the Constitution and established precedents.
His appointment is expected to bring a balance to the court, moving it away from the trend of judicial activism in favor of a more conservative approach. With a now 5-4 conservative majority, the Supreme Court may be more likely to strike down laws that are not constitutionally sound, particularly when it comes to matters like gun control and other contentious issues. This shift is welcomed by those who believe in the rule of law and a constitutional government, as it allows for lawmaking to be returned to the elected branches of government (Congress and the President).
Impact on Gun Control and Immigration Laws
One of the most significant long-term effects of Judge Kavanaugh's confirmation is likely to be seen in the realm of gun control. As an originalist, Judge Kavanaugh's judicial philosophy is likely to uphold the Second Amendment in its traditional context, which could lead to the overturning of increasingly restrictive gun control laws. This is already anticipated as a consequence of his nomination, and many previously enacted laws are expected to fall.
Another area that will see significant changes is immigration law. The Supreme Court's recent ruling on President Trump's immigration enforcement policies is a clear indication of this move. The Court is expected to continue holding the executive and legislative branches accountable for following the laws as they are written, rather than allowing them to bend the rules to their advantage. This means that illegal administrative actions like DACA, which was an executive order, are likely to face judicial scrutiny and possibly be invalidated.
Conclusion
The confirmation of Judge Kavanaugh to the U.S. Supreme Court is a pivotal moment in the U.S. legal and political landscapes. While the immediate effects of the confirmation battle have been contentious, the long-term impact is expected to solidify a more conservative approach to constitutional interpretation and law enforcement. This shift may help to reign in judicial activism and return the balance to a constitutional republic, ensuring that the law is applied consistently and fairly. As the political climate continues to evolve, the impact of Judge Kavanaugh's appointment will undoubtedly be felt in the years to come.