The Importance of Reading Entire Books Before Writing Reviews
As a professional book reviewer, the process of reviewing a book involves a meticulous examination of the text. This process typically commences with the entire reading of the book, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the narrative, style, and underlying messages.
Traditional Review vs. Time Constraints
Traditionally, book reviewers are expected to read the entire book, especially when writing for publications that demand in-depth analysis and critical examination. However, in today's fast-paced environment, especially when dealing with advance review copies (ARCs), some reviewers might skim through parts of the book. This approach is feasible when the reviewer is familiar with the author's work or the book is notably short. Skimming can provide a general impression, albeit incomplete, to help form an initial judgment.
Comprehensive Review as a Necessity
One cannot review a book without having experienced it in its entirety. It is crucial to read the entire book to fully grasp the narrative progression, the language, and the overall structure. A book that appears disjointed upon initial reading might evolve into an intelligible and well-organized piece of literature. Some themes and ideas can only be properly conveyed through a detailed reading and reflection.
Real-life Examples of Book Reviewing
From personal experience, regular book reviewing in retirement required a thorough read. While I had little time to review all the books I wanted to, a complete read remains essential. There are instances where strategies such as reading key sections can provide a general impression, but a full read is often necessary.
For example, if a book does not hold my interest, I might stop reading and write a limited review, explaining the reasons I couldn't proceed. Over 50 years of reviewing, I have done this only a few times. My ethos was to review books only if I had fully engaged with them, ensuring an accurate and fair representation.
Ethical Considerations in Reviewing
Academic book reviewers hold a higher standard of ethical integrity. They are not just trusted to read the book thoroughly but also to understand the broader context within their field. In the academic world, it is implicitly understood that the reviewer has not only read the book but also explored related literature in the subject area. This ensures a well-rounded and informed review.
To publish a review without reading the entire book would be unethical and raises ethical concerns. Reviewers are bound by the trust placed in them by readers and organizations they review for, and a complete reading is an essential part of this professional responsibility.
Conclusion
Whether for an academic journal or a casual review, the responsibility of a book reviewer lies in providing a thorough, well-informed, and ethical assessment. The act of reading the entire book is not just about following a standard procedure but about ensuring the integrity and reliability of the review. It is a fundamental aspect of maintaining the trust and respect of both readers and the literary community.