Why Are There More Male Programmers Than Female Programmers?
It has been observed that there are more male programmers than female programmers, which has sparked extensive debate and discussion. This phenomenon is magnified in the fields of computer science, software engineering, and other tech professions. My personal journey in being a mechanical/data engineer and my extensive experience tutoring and studying with engineers has provided me with a unique perspective on this topic. In this article, I will delve into the reasons behind this gender gap and explore how genetic inclination and obsessiveness play significant roles in determining the success of engineers.
The Genetic Inclination Hypothesis
The idea that there is a genetic inclination favoring males in the field of engineering is not a novel concept. I believe that this inclination provides a slight advantage to males in certain aspects of engineering, such as persistent problem-solving and obsessive focus. However, it is crucial to emphasize that this does not mean that women cannot overcome this 'tiny inclination' and excel. Additionally, it is important to refute the notion that men are necessarily smarter. Rather, it is the obsessiveness and genetic predispositions that may give men an edge.
The Nature of Obsessiveness in Engineering
Engineering, particularly at the highest levels, requires a considerable degree of obsessiveness. It is not sufficient to be merely intelligent; one must possess a certain degree of 'weirdness' or obsession to excel. This trait is reflected in the 16:1 disparity of males to females on the autism spectrum, which correlates with the inclination towards engineering. Obsessiveness is a characteristic that can lead not only to success in engineering but also to other fields like chess, billiards, gaming, and more.
Obsessiveness vs. Societal Pressures
While genetic predispositions play a role, it is also essential to recognize the impact of societal pressures and 'glass ceilings.' These barriers can significantly hinder the advancement of women in engineering. However, addressing and overcoming these societal challenges is vital for achieving gender equality. Despite these external factors, the biological differences and genetic inclinations of males can still result in a higher representation of males in top-level engineering positions.
As a data engineer, I can attest to the fact that even very subtle differences can have significant consequences. For instance, minute genetic differences, such as the 0.01 increase in male births during and after wars, can influence the distribution of obsessional traits. Similarly, a 0.0076 Pa pressure difference over decades can lead to catastrophic consequences. These examples highlight the importance of considering genetic factors in explaining the gender gap in engineering.
Encouragement for Female Engineers
While the top-level demographics may not change due to these genetic and obsessive tendencies, it is crucial to encourage and support women in engineering. Engineering requires a unique combination of skills, including obsessiveness, and women can certainly excel in these areas. The input and perspective of women in engineering are invaluable. I support female engineers and encourage my own daughters to take math classes more seriously. I am committed to seeing every female engineer succeed and would even support specific initiatives to help them achieve their goals.
My perspective is not merely an academic observation but a personal belief. I am a strong advocate for women in engineering and believe that they can lead the field to new heights. While the rigid top-level demographics may persist, the foundation of innovation and success in engineering can be broadened by the diverse perspectives brought by female engineers.