Teaching Methods That Boost Test Scores: Insights From an Ex-Educator

The quest for higher standardized test scores often leads educators to explore different teaching methods. For decades, I have observed that some teaching strategies yield exceptional results. This article delves into the methods that helped my students achieve outstanding scores, contrary to the prevailing trends that correlate with socioeconomic status.

Practical Comprehensive Approach: The Excel Program

During my 40 years of teaching elementary math, particularly 4th and 5th grades, one program stood out: 'Excel.' This supplemental math program, developed by a small publishing company in San Diego, California, proved to be transformative. Each lesson was meticulously structured, offering a ‘tiny bite’ of new information seamlessly integrated with extensive review material. This balance ensured a solid foundation and retained what students had already learned.

Implementing 'Excel' on year-end tests, about half of my class achieved scores in the 90th percentile or higher. Notably, no student scored below the 50th percentile. In contrast, when I used the regular curriculum, only three students typically scored in the 90th percentile, and half the class performed below the 50th percentile. The significant difference in performance was striking.

The program cost $400 annually, which I funded privately. However, I faced resistance from the school principal, eventually leading to my firing. My contract was not renewed, even though I had planned to retire. Unfortunately, the Excel publisher ceased operations as the program never gained mainstream adoption due to its plain approach compared to more flashy alternatives.

Impact of Sleep: A Secondary School’s Success

Another fascinating observation comes from the secondary school where I briefly worked. This school began its day two hours later, allowing students to get enough sleep. This change had a profound impact on their standardized test scores. The lowest scores were in the 90th percentile, and many students achieved perfect scores. This example underscores how simple adjustments can significantly influence academic performance.

Descriptive Feedback and Growth Mindset

The most powerful 'high-yield strategy' I implemented was descriptive feedback coupled with opportunities for students to use this feedback to demonstrate growth. This method encouraged students to reflect on their progress and take proactive steps to improve. Descriptive feedback provided specific details about what students did well and areas needing improvement, rather than vague praise or criticism.

I found that when students received constructive feedback and had the chance to apply it, their understanding and retention of the material improved. This approach fostered a growth mindset, empowering students to believe in their potential and work towards continuous improvement.

Research and Socioeconomic Factors

Before asking this question, it's important to note that the premise of the question is partially incorrect. Student test scores on standardized tests do correlate strongly with socioeconomic background. Students from affluent backgrounds typically outperform those from less affluent backgrounds. Therefore, when analyzing a group of students, it's crucial to consider their socioeconomic status.

For instance, you can explore state standardized test results online. In the United States, most states provide test results by school district, revealing that the districts with the highest scores are often those in wealthier cities and neighborhoods. This data highlights the impact of socioeconomic factors on educational outcomes.

While individual classrooms that consistently outperform others may exist, test data is generally not publicly available in the detailed format that would allow for such comparisons. However, by understanding the broader context, educators can tailor their strategies to better support all students, regardless of their background.