Should Writers Read Similar Books Before Writing Their Own?
There's a long-standing debate in the writer's community: should one read similar books before embarking on their own writing journey?
The Case Against Reading Similar Books Before Writing
When I write, I prioritize originality and freshness over conformity. I consume a vast array of literary fiction, genres that include both The War Folder and Phoenix Rising. However, I deliberately avoid reading works that are too similar to my own ongoing projects. The fear is that these similar works could overshadow my own creativity, making it difficult for my stories to emerge in a unique and compelling way.
I believe that my writing should be a direct manifestation of my thoughts and experiences, not a derivative of others'. Drawing inspiration from too many similar books can blur the line between originality and imitation. Moreover, the influx of others' ideas can tangle my own narrative threads, making it harder to let the work evolve naturally.
The Case For Reading Similar Books Before Writing
On the flip side, there are plenty of successful authors who find inspiration in immersing themselves in similar works before crafting their own. Take Stephen King, who draws heavily from the horror genre, heavily influenced by H.P. Lovecraft. Another example is Iain M. Banks, whose science fiction stories stem from his love for the genre as a child. These authors have masterfully woven the narratives they admire into their own unique voices, enhancing their storytelling repertoire.
Authors who commit to a specific genre often find that their work is inextricably linked to the traditions and themes of that genre. They read extensively within the boundaries of their chosen field to understand its nuances, styles, and conventions. This deeper understanding can be invaluable in shaping their own stories and ensuring they connect with the audience they aspire to reach.
My Personal Approach to Writing
I prefer to write what comes organically from my own mind, rather than piecing together smaller ideas from similar sources. My writing process is a direct reflection of my own experiences, emotions, and internal monologue. I believe that forcing the work through the lens of others' ideas can stifle my creativity and the unique voice that I try to cultivate.
My first chapbook, Places and Faces, is a prime example of this approach. While I did take note of the typical construction, format, and subject matter of chapbooks, I ultimately wrote it as a tribute to my own experiences and emotions. This personal touch is what sets it apart and makes it resonate with readers on a deeper level.
My approach is subjective, and it stems from my own beliefs about the power of originality and the importance of authenticity in the writing process. I believe that by staying true to my own voice and experiences, I can create stories that are both unique and deeply moving.
Conclusion
The debate over whether writers should read similar books before writing their own is one that continues to captivate the literary community. While some find inspiration and structure within the works of their peers, others, like myself, believe in harnessing the raw, unfiltered creativity of their own minds. Both approaches have their merits, and ultimately, it comes down to finding the method that best shapes your own unique voice and vision.
Regardless of your approach, the key is to stay receptive to new ideas and continue learning, whether that means reading similar books or pushing the boundaries of your own creativity. The journey of writing is both a journey of discovery and a journey of self-expression, and the right balance of inspiration and originality will help you create stories that resonate with readers and stand the test of time.
Keywords: writing process, literary inspiration, genre influence