Scotland’s Voice: Addressing the Call for Independence

The debate over independence for Scotland has seen several twists and turns, with the current movement likely to be the third major referendum since 1979. The question remains: do Scots genuinely seek another referendum? To answer this, we must first examine the historical context and evaluate the arguments for and against independence.

Historical Context and Rejection of Democracy

In 1979, Scotland's first independence referendum was marred by the so-called 'silly season' when Westminster politicians rejected the outcome, citing insufficient voter turnout. This marked an early instance of the Westminster establishment overriding the democratic will of the Scottish people. Fast forward to modern times, the Scottish National Party (SNP) and the Green Party have once again rallied support for a third referendum. However, the current political landscape is vastly different, and there are compelling reasons why the status quo is perceived as failing.

A Moving Away from Westminster

It is not merely the SNP and Green Party that advocate for another referendum; there is broader sentiment among Scots that Westminster has become a corrupt and failing system. The establishment's refusal to respect democratic mandates in the past has fueled disillusionment and a desire for a new direction. The British establishment, with its focus on power and influence for corporate and big business interests, is often seen as subscribing to a highly undemocratic and corrupt system. This view is supported by high turnover among politicians, issues of financial backing from wealthy donors, and a media landscape that often serves as a mouthpiece for these interests.

The E.U. and Scotland's Future

The European Union, despite its imperfections, is often seen as a more stable and well-administered alternative to the current government in Westminster. In contrast, the UK's quality of administration and, particularly, education have been marred by a pervasive sense of corruption and incompetence. Even after Brexit, which has clearly impacted the UK's position in the global context, a majority of Scots are not satisfied with the outcome. There is a strong desire to return to the EU's stable political and economic framework and to avoid the mistakes of Brexit.

Political Corruption and Its Impact on Scotland

Politicians like Boris Johnson, who championed Brexit, have been criticized for their dishonorable motives. Their ascent to power, facilitated by figures like Dominic Cummings, appears to be rooted in a desire for personal gain rather than genuine political progress. This has further fueled skepticism towards the political class. As a canny people, the Scots have long seen through the delusions and ineptitude of Brexit advocates. They desire the benefits and stability that the EU can provide, free from the constraints of a Westminster that is more interested in elite prosperity than democratic and basic human rights.

What's Next?

Should Scotland achieve independence, it is likely that other devolved regions, including some English regions, may follow suit. The oligarchic nature of the UK's system, dominated by financial interests and flawed electoral processes, is driving this desire. Without meaningful change, the prospect of regional autonomy and control over local matters becomes more appealing. The Westminster Parliament, often seen as a Titanic bound for disaster, offers little in terms of real democratic governance and socioeconomic progress.

In conclusion, the call for another Scottish independence referendum is not just a sentiment but a response to a failing political system. As the UK continues to grapple with its post-Brexit reality, the voice of Scotland for greater autonomy and democratic accountability grows louder. The path to a new and perhaps better future is clear, and the Scottish people are united in their quest for it.