Referred Names of Graduated Institutions: CSU Hayward vs. Cal State East Bay
Introduction
As academic institutions evolve, sometimes altering their names, it raises the question: should graduates continue to refer to such institutions by their original names or adopt the new monikers? This article explores the case of CSU Hayward and Cal State East Bay, and discusses how past students might choose to refer to their alma maters in various contexts, such as job applications or casual conversations with peers.
Historical Context of CSU Hayward to Cal State East Bay
Before discussing the referred names, it's important to understand the institutional history. CSU Hayward, now known as Cal State East Bay, was previously a trustee institution named after the city of Hayward, California. The transition from CSU Hayward to Cal State East Bay illustrates the changes that academic institutions undergo and the impact these changes can have on alumni's reference to their schools.
The name change occurred due to various factors, including reorganization within the California State University (CSU) system. The new name, Cal State East Bay, aligns more closely with the geographical and institutional identity of the institution, which spans several cities in the eastern part of the Bay Area.
Alumni and Referred Names
Alumni are often attached to the institution's original name due to personal and sentimental reasons. For instance, many alumni, like myself, still refer to their institutions as CSU Hayward out of habit, despite the name change. This attachment can stem from deep-seated memories, campus traditions, and the sense of belonging that comes with being a part of an institution with a long and storied history.
However, it's not uncommon for alumni to change their references over time, especially when interacting with students, staff, or individuals within the new system. In such cases, it's important to be respectful of the institution's current identity. It shows recognition of the institution's evolution and perhaps aligns more closely with the present identity and culture of the university.
Some alumni go as far as refusing to call the institution by its new name, preferring to stick to the old name as a form of resistance. This can sometimes create a divide between generations of alumni who may feel strongly connected to different names. Yet, in professional or formal contexts, such as online job applications, it's essential to be cognizant of the modern nomenclature to ensure that one's application is thoroughly professional and aligned with current institutional standards.
Professional Considerations and Online Applications
In the highly competitive job market, using the correct name on job applications can be crucial. Employers and recruiters often use specific institutional names for search purposes, and referring to the institution by its original name on an application may not align with the expected search criteria and can potentially reduce the chances of an application being seen.
For instance, if a job application site only lists "Cal State East Bay," using "CSU Hayward" might not ensure that the application is found by the desired audience. Furthermore, on social media and networking platforms, maintaining the new name also shows an understanding of how the institution is currently perceived and its current relevance.
It's worth noting that while individuals might have their preferred name, consistency in the language used in official documents and online profiles can help maintain a professional image and assure future employers of an individual's adaptability and alignment with modern institutional practices.
Impact on Students and Alumni Relations
The transition from one name to another can have a significant impact on the relationships and networks of both students and alumni. For instance, when talking with current students or faculty, it's courteous to use the institution's current name to show respect and understanding of the changes that have taken place. This approach fosters a more harmonious relationship within the academic community as it acknowledges the institution's current identity and trajectory.
However, when communicating with alumni from different generations, it's essential to be aware of any preferences or sensitivities. Balancing the respect for the old name and the recognition of the new name can be a fine line. Open communication, clarity, and a willingness to adapt can help bridge the gap between generations and ensure a more united and inclusive alumni community.
Ultimately, the decision to use the old or new name often comes down to the situation and audience. In formal and professional settings, using the new name is generally more appropriate, while personal or casual settings might allow for more flexibility and respect of individual preferences.
Conclusion
Despite the name change, the legacy of institutions like CSU Hayward lives on through the experiences and memories of their alumni. However, staying cognizant of the institutional name helps in navigating the professional world and interacting with current and future students and staff. By understanding the balance between personal attachment and professional respect, both current and former students can ensure that they represent the institution appropriately in a variety of contexts.
Keywords: CSU Hayward, Cal State East Bay, UTRGV, UT Pan-Am, School Naming Changes