President Trump and the Legal Implications of Inciting the January 6 Riot

President Trump and the Legal Implications of Inciting the January 6 Riot

The question of whether former President Donald Trump can be charged for attempting to assassinate Mike Pence has sparked intense debate and legal scrutiny. While the evidence is convincing that Trump incited violence during the January 6, 2021, riot, the legal hurdles to actual prosecution are steep.

Legal Provisions and Probable Convictions

The key issue in determining if Trump can be charged for attempted murder is whether there was sufficient proximate cause and intent. In the incident involving former UK Archbishop Thomas Becket, King Henry II initially expressed shock when one of his barons carried out the assassination. Similarly, Trump may have expressed shock over the violence that followed his incitement, yet his role remains questionable.
“He could if he resided in a democracy.” – Trump
Trump knew that inciting the riot would likely lead to violence, but the exact intent to harm Pence might not be provable. Therefore, although he can be charged with many crimes, conviction is still a considerable challenge.

Charges of Incitement and Conspiracy

Despite the lack of direct evidence linking Trump to an assassination plot, the riot's aftermath provides enough grounds for other charges. For instance, the January 6 riot itself can be seen as a conspiracy to commit a coup. Trump's role in orchestrating the events of that day could be classified as incitement of crime. Furthermore, there is a strong case for negligent manslaughter, given the deaths that occurred during the riot.

Incitement of Crime

Labeling Trump’s actions as incitement of crime is a feasible legal strategy. His tweets and public statements urging for Pence’s impeachment and invalidation of the electoral process escalated the situation. The subsequent chants by the mob, including “hang Mike Pence,” indicate that the violence was premeditated rather than spontaneous. This charge could be sustained if the evidence supports that his actions directly contributed to the riot's violence.

Conspiracy to Commit a Coup

Despite the obvious political implications, it is possible to frame Trump's actions as a conspiracy to commit a coup. His failure to act on known threats against Pence and his public statements could be seen as part of a larger plan to disrupt the democratic process.

Probabilities of Conviction and Legal Strategy

A conviction for attempted murder or any related charges against Trump is highly improbable due to the complex nature of proving intent. The evidence pointing to an assassination plot is minimal, and Trump’s disavowal of any such plots further complicates the case. However, less demanding charges such as incitement, conspiracy, and even manslaughter might have a better chance of conviction.

The prosecution would need to demonstrate that Trump's actions directly caused the riot and that this directly led to any resulting fatalities. A "reasonable person" standard would be applied, meaning that what Trump genuinely believed would happen is less important than what a reasonable person could foresee happening.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while President Trump's actions on January 6, 2021, were undoubtedly corrupt and explosive, the current legal landscape makes it unlikely that he will face charges for attempted murder or any related assassination attempt. Proving the intent and direct causation necessary for such charges would be extremely challenging. However, lesser charges like incitement of crime and conspiracy could still hold significant weight in a court of law. The incident remains a pivotal moment in American political history, and ongoing legal analyses will continue to reveal the full extent of the repercussions.

Further Reading

U.S. Department of Justice Investigation of the January 6, 2021, Riot at the Capitol
The Washington Post’s Investigation into Trump’s Role in the January 6 Riot