Perceptions of Internal Affairs Officers Among Peer Police Officers

The perception of Internal Affairs (IA) officers among their peers in the police force can vary widely. While some officers view IA units with suspicion and disdain, others appreciate the role they play in upholding accountability and integrity within their departments. This article explores differing viewpoints and the factors that influence these perceptions.

Negative Perceptions and Suspicions

There are several instances where IA units have garnered negative perceptions from their peers. One such scenario involves IA investigators who show bias or favoritism. As a former IA officer, I witnessed instances where one officer was invited to watch a video appeal for termination, leading to a change in the narrative. Subsequently, the IA department was responsible for firing the sergeant. This action raised questions about the integrity of IA units. Such incidents suggest that IA divisions can be perceived as untrustworthy and potentially unprofessional, fostering a sense of distrust among their peers.

Another aspect that can contribute to negative perceptions is the unimpressive and unremarkable nature of some IA sections. In these units, the investigators may lack the necessary skills or motivation to uphold the integrity of the department. This can lead to the belief that IA is merely a formality, with little genuine impact on maintaining a high standard of conduct among police officers.

Positive Perceptions and Trust

There are also instances where IA officers are highly respected and trusted. For example, some IA investigators have a genuine desire to uncover the truth and ensure justice is served. One such colleague, who was a good friend, was dedicated to his duties and used any means necessary to discover the truth. Such commitment to integrity can earn the respect and trust of their peers, fostering a more positive perception of IA within the force.

Realities and Expectations of Internal Affairs

From my experience as an IA investigator, I found that most officers, especially in modern policing, understood and appreciated the role of IA. They did not harbor warm and fuzzy feelings about the job, but they did not go out of their way to bash it either. Handling IA was compared to dealing with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)—a necessary but often frustrating task. The challenges arise when IA officers and their colleagues lose sight of their responsibilities and begin to act outside their duties.

In my previous role as an IA investigator, I noticed that most officers carried out their responsibilities within the guidelines and scope of their authority. This resulted in my interactions with them being respectful and objective, two traits that contribute positively to the overall functioning of law enforcement.

Conclusion

The perception of IA officers varies greatly among their peers. While some may view them with suspicion and disdain, others see them as essential for maintaining accountability and integrity within the force. Understanding the nuances of these perceptions and the factors that shape them is crucial for fostering a more positive and productive relationship between IA and the broader law enforcement community.

The key to improving perceptions is the consistent and ethical performance of IA duties. By remaining true to their mandate, IA officers can earn the respect and trust of their peers, contributing to a more effective and honest law enforcement environment.