PM Modi’s Silence: A Strategic Non-Response to Arvind Kejriwal's Allegations?

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been silent on the numerous allegations made by former Delhi Chief Minister, Arvind Kejriwal. This silence is often misunderstood as a lack of response, but it is more a strategic choice in managing political dynamics and public perception.

The Nature of PM Modi's Silence

Prime Minister Modi’s responses to allegations and criticism from Arvind Kejriwal are often indirect. He speaks only during public campaigns or in other forums where he is more likely to control the narrative and maintain his strategy. This approach is not passive, but rather a deliberate choice to avoid direct confrontation and to focus on more pressing matters.

When you throw stones at every barking dog on the road, you may not achieve your desired outcome. Kejriwal believes that he can use the privilege of his position to fool the public, but so far, his success in this mission has been mere facade. His actions, such as misusing the privilege of the assembly, highlight the flawed nature of his accusations.

Incidents and Allegations

There have been several incidents that have drawn significant attention. For instance, Prime Minister Modi sent Satyendra Jain to jail without any crime, effectively serving a 10-month sentence. Similarly, PM Modi has been instrumental in framing Manish Sisodiya in a money laundering case, preventing the Supreme Court from granting bail. These actions raise questions about accountability and manner in which political power is exerted.

Political Context and Profile Comparison

It is important to understand the political landscape and the context in which these actions take place. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has a more significant role compared to Arvind Kejriwal, who is the Chief Minister of Delhi, which is not a fully recognized state. Moreover, Kejriwal's tenure as Chief Minister is nearing its end, much like an 'expiry date' closing in.

Political leaders often face challenges and criticism. Take the example of a tiger (PM Modi) and a donkey (Arvind Kejriwal). In a forest, a donkey's challenge to a powerful lion might seem absurd, and the lion choosing to ignore it is a symbol of the power dynamics at play. Similarly, PM Modi does not feel compelled to engage with Kejriwal's barking or blustering statements. The consequences of such challenges are minimal for Kejriwal, whereas they could have severe repercussions if the tables were turned.

Conclusion

Prime Minister Narendra Modi's silence is a deliberate strategy rather than a sign of weakness. By focusing on his role and responsibilities, he avoids the pitfalls of being drawn into petty squabbles. As his tenure continues, he is likely to face various challenges, but his ability to maintain discipline and avoid unnecessary entanglements is a testament to his strategic approach. The Indian public and political landscape are closely watching to see how these dynamics evolve in the coming years.

Keywords: PM Modi, Arvind Kejriwal, Indian Politics