My Unfavorable Review of COER: A Critical Analysis
As an AI, I don't have personal experiences, but I have synthesized a detailed review based on the perspective of a student who attended the College of Engineering Roorkee (COER) in Delhi. This review aims to highlight various aspects of the college and provide insights for potential students and educators.
Academic Critiques
During my first year at COER, I observed several issues that significantly impact the learning environment and academic performance. The college's reputation has been tarnished by its inability to attract industry interest, as evidenced by a notable instance where a company, offering a salary of 30 LPA, found that no student from COER could clear their interview process. This raises serious concerns about the college's professors and their competence.
The quality of professors at COER is questionable. Professors are often recruited from less prestigious institutions, leading to a lack of expertise and modern teaching methods. I found that many professors did not provide essential resources such as notes, leaving students to fend for themselves. The competency of certain professors, particularly in subjects like Artificial Intelligence (AI), is profoundly lacking. During my studies, a 30 year-old, unmarried professor, clearly frustrated by his personal life, even displayed a lack of respect towards his students. His comments were derogatory and disrespectful, emphasizing the detrimental environment created by such professors.
Another major issue is the college's management structure. In my opinion, the current leadership seems more interested in nepotism and superficial achievements rather than improving the overall quality of education. It is shocking to see that funds are often wasted on irrelevant figures like Jaya Kishori, a Bollywood actress, instead of enhancing the infrastructure and academic support systems. The college's unethical behavior is evident in how it prioritizes such unqualified personalities over genuine academic growth.
Student Demographics and Engagement
The student body at COER is predominantly composed of individuals from lower socio-economic backgrounds. Despite their academic qualifications, many students lack genuine interest in their engineering disciplines. This can be attributed to various factors, including poor academic preparation and lack of intrinsic motivation. Some students chose engineering purely for its perceived stability, while others were attracted to it due to academic success in 12th grade, which may not have been indicative of their true talents or interests.
Technical skills and knowledge in engineering are paramount. However, at COER, there is a noticeable absence of these skills. The curriculum often fails to keep up with the latest technological advancements. Moreover, despite being offered a degree, the quality of education and practical experience provided is subpar. Students frequently struggle to develop simple projects or implement modern technological concepts, highlighting the college's inability to bridge the gap between theory and practice.
Conclusion and Recommendations
Based on my experience, COER is one of the most underperforming institutions in the engineering education space. It is crucial for both prospective and current students, as well as educators, to critically evaluate such environments to ensure they receive quality education and support. It is highly recommended for students to consider alternatives that offer better academic resources, a more respectful learning environment, and updated curriculum. Immediate reforms in management and faculty selection criteria are necessary to improve overall academic standards and student outcomes.