Is Wikipedia Acceptable in Academic Research Papers?

Many students and researchers ask whether they can cite Wikipedia in their academic research papers. The short answer is no, Wikipedia is generally not considered a reliable source for scholarly or academic writing. This article will delve into the reasons behind this guideline and provide guidance on finding alternative credible sources.

Why Wikipedia is Not a Reliable Source

Wikipedia is a tertiary source, meaning that it compiles and summarizes information from various sources. It is not a primary or secondary source and lacks the rigor of scholarly research. Anyone can edit Wikipedia articles, and this process isn't always subject to the same level of rigorous editorial oversight as traditional academic journals or books.

The Importance of Credible Sources

For academic research, it is crucial to use credible sources that provide high-quality, fact-checked information. College and university databases are designed to offer such sources. These databases contain peer-reviewed articles, books, and other scholarly materials that undergo rigorous peer review and editorial processes.

Alternative Sources and Guidelines

So, what can you do if you come across interesting information on Wikipedia but need a more credible source? There are several ways to address this issue:

1. Check the Footnotes and References

The footnotes and references provided in Wikipedia articles can be invaluable. Often, these references direct you to primary or secondary sources such as books, journal articles, and reputable academic websites. By following these references, you can find more reliable and credible information.

2. Use Scholarly Databases

Colleges and universities typically provide access to a wide range of scholarly databases such as JSTOR, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar. These databases contain peer-reviewed articles and books that are more accurate and reliable for your research.

3. BadgerLink for Non-Students

If you are not affiliated with a college or university, you can still access many scholarly resources through platforms like BadgerLink, which offers free access to a range of resources for Wisconsin residents.

Special Cases and Exceptions

There are rare cases where using Wikipedia itself can be acceptable. For instance, if your research is focused on the characteristics and structure of Wikipedia itself, as a case study or an object of study, then using Wikipedia is perfectly fine. However, for summarizing or citing information from Wikipedia articles, you should still refer to the original sources or secondary sources that Wikipedia references.

Conclusion

While Wikipedia is a convenient tool for gathering initial information and understanding a topic, it is not suitable as a primary source for academic research. It is always advisable to follow the guidelines set by specific disciplines, such as MLA, APA, and Vancouver, which often recommend using peer-reviewed sources for their rigor and reliability.

By adhering to these guidelines, you ensure that your academic research papers are based on accurate, reliable, and credible information, which in turn leads to higher-quality work and better academic performance.