Balochistan: Baloch activists have long called for India's support to free Balochistan. This sentiment is driven by a demand for autonomy and not a desire to be annexed by India. The Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF) has been fighting for greater rights and sovereignty within Pakistan, but their calls for support from India are more about gaining international attention and legitimacy.

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa: Pashtuns in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa have held anti-Pakistan protests in Islamabad, demanding Azadi (freedom). This movement is predominately a reaction to political and economic grievances rather than a call for an alliance with India. Such movements often use rhetoric that includes alliances with other countries, but the primary goal is typically to seek political change within Pakistan.

India's Motivation and Interests

India has historically shown no interest in dividing or annexing any nation, including Pakistan. In fact, India's strategic interests lie in maintaining regional stability, ensuring peace, and enhancing economic cooperation. Historically, India has consistently sought peaceful resolutions and avoided direct interventions in the internal affairs of neighboring countries. To suggest that India is keen on partitioning Pakistan is not only unfounded but also undermines the trust and cooperation between the two nations.

Example: During the 1971 war, while India supported East Pakistan (now Bangladesh), it was also concerned about maintaining regional stability. The acquisition of 92,000 Pakistani prisoners of war (POWs) was a significant achievement, but it was part of India's broader strategic goals to ensure the successful secession of East Pakistan.

The Nuclear Threat

The recent dismissal of India's nuclear capabilities and the threat of nuclear war is a critical aspect that needs consideration. India has been steadfast in maintaining control and security of its nuclear arsenal, avoiding the escalation of conflicts. Similarly, Pakistan has its own nuclear arsenal, which serves as a deterrent against potential aggression. Both nations understand the catastrophic consequences of nuclear warfare and therefore, any move towards division must be carefully considered.

Political and Economic Alternatives

The argument that India would need to manage division through political and economic means is indeed a realistic consideration. Any such endeavor would require a significant shift in Pakistan's internal political dynamics and economic policies. Achieving this would need comprehensive strategies, including diplomatic negotiations, economic assistance, and social reforms. It would also require the active participation of the Indian government, international organizations, and the global community.

Historical Precedent: The reunification of East and West Germany is often cited as a potential model. Just fifty years ago, who could have predicted that two countries would reunite as a single nation? While the reunification of India and Pakistan is not in the realm of possibility, the division of Pakistan into regions would be a significant political and social change, making it a dream that may never come true.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the suggestion that India is interested in dividing Pakistan is an unfounded claim. The historical context, ongoing internal dynamics, and the nuclear threat all point towards a more pragmatic approach to regional relations. While Pakistani regions may have distinct voices and demands, the idea of a total division through military or political conquest is highly unlikely. Instead, constructive dialogue, understanding, and cooperation will be the key to addressing regional disparities and fostering peace and stability in South Asia.