Is 27% OBC Reservation in All Indian Medical Seats Beneficial or Harmful?
The question of whether providing 27% OBC (Other Backward Classes) reservation in all Indian medical seats is a beneficial or harmful decision has been a subject of intense debate. From the perspective of OBC candidates, this reservation has undoubtedly been a positive step, as it ensures more equal opportunities. However, for general candidates, this reservation might seem disadvantageous, leading to an increased competition for limited seats. This article seeks to dissect the implications of this decision, drawing insights from the political context, practical benefits, and social challenges.
Understanding the Political Context
The decision to implement such a significant reservation in medical seats was supported by all opposition parties without exception. This support underscores the political alignment behind the policy. Such a decisive backing by opposition parties suggests that the decision is not merely sector-specific but aligns with broader political strategies. It is essential to understand the dynamics behind this support to comprehend the broader implications of the policy.
The Policy Background
It is noteworthy that the current government once supported reservations based on financial status, such as the EWS (Economically Weaker Sections). This shift in focus from caste-based to financial-based reservations highlights a significant change in the government's stance. The government had proposed EWS reservations, which would target economically disadvantaged sections of society rather than caste-based reservations. However, the political landscape shifted, leading to the current 27% OBC reservation.
Implications of Increasing Medical Colleges
Even if the number of medical colleges were to multiply by more than ten times, the primary benefit would still be limited. The current scenario in many countries, including India, indicates a severe shortage of medical professionals. For instance, India currently has one doctor for every 11,000 people, while Bangladesh has one doctor for every 1,000 people. This stark disparity highlights the urgent need for more medical professionals. Furthermore, doctors in India do not face the same employment constraints as other professionals like engineers, as there is a limited government employment availability in this field.
The Financial and Social Challenges
However, the significant increase in medical seats would require substantial funding, a challenge that is currently being exacerbated by financial mismanagement. There is significant evidence of corruption and misappropriation of funds, with many politicians, including some at the cabinet level, being involved in embezzlement and other financial crimes. Moreover, there is a large amount of black money stashed in foreign banks, as reported by authorities, but this issue remains unresolved.
Social Stigma and Constitutionality
People often resent the reservation system in education and employment because it has become a source of social stigma. However, it is crucial to recognize that reserved candidates are also Indians, constituting more than 70% of the Indian population. As a constitutional obligation, it is the responsibility of the government to ensure equal development for all sections of the population. It is essential to move beyond the reservation obsession and address more pressing issues like unemployment.
Addressing Unemployment in the Medical Sector
The medical sector faces a significant unemployment challenge. Every year, over 15 lakh engineers graduate, with less than 20% of these graduates finding employment. As a result, the country faces an 'unemployment tsunami.' Additionally, the privatization of public sector enterprises under the PVNR Manmohonic reforms has led to a situation where multinational companies are gaining control, potentially leading to drastic changes in employment dynamics. Low-level contractual jobs are becoming the norm, mirroring the situation faced by Gulf workers.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while the 27% OBC reservation in medical seats has its drawbacks, particularly concerning general candidates and employment competition, it is a necessary and constitutional obligation to ensure equal representation. It is important to address the underlying financial and social challenges that hinder the effective implementation of such policies. Moving forward, it is crucial to focus on finding solutions to these issues rather than getting caught in the reservation obsession. By doing so, we can work towards a more equitable and prosperous society.