How Does an Atheist Explain the Unexplained?

The age-old question of explaining the unexplained has always been a thorny one, often leading to debates between believers and non-believers. For an atheist, there is a straightforward approach: the admission that “I don’t know” is a valid and honest stance. This stance not only highlights a commitment to scientific understanding but also acknowledges the limits of human knowledge.

The Role of Science in Explaining the Unexplained

The honest atheist will often say, “I don’t know and I will not pretend to know just so I can pretend to know everything. It is okay to still be learning and not to know everything.” This perspective aligns with the scientific method, which inherently allows for the possibility that our current understanding is incomplete and subject to revision.

The Concept of Unexplained Phenomena

Unexplained things, in an atheist's view, are simply phenomena that we currently do not understand. They are not eternal mysteries but rather challenges for further scientific investigation. Attributing the unknown to a supernatural being, such as God, would only perpetuate the so-called mysteries; it would not provide a real explanation. As more knowledge is acquired, any such attributions become increasingly trivial.

The Limits of Attribution to the Supernatural

The assertion that theists can explain the unexplained is often ill-founded. For many theists, unproven beliefs are used to explain everything, which is a form of circular reasoning. For instance, the origin of the universe, the complexity of life, and various natural phenomena are often attributed to divine intervention without substantial evidence.

The Definition of Atheism

Atheism is the simple and definitive answer to the question of belief in any gods. It is not a complex doctrine but a straightforward stance of disbelief. Here’s a breakdown of what an atheist is (and is not):

Evolution: This is settled science, not a matter of belief. The origin of the universe: No one knows the exact origin, and it’s perfectly fine to say “we don’t know.” The origin of human beings: Settled science, supported by extensive evidence from anthropology and genetics. Science as an intellectual discipline: Many atheists are scientists, and some scientists are not atheists. Morality and ethics: These are social constructs that vary across cultures and societies. Law and laws: Even though some atheists are lawyers, their profession is unrelated to their atheism. The Bible or other religious books: These are not our books; they are the property and texts of religious adherents. Religion: Atheists view the various belief systems and myths surrounding religious figures as irrelevant to their stance. Satan or “the Devil”: Simply another mythological figure that does not hold meaning for those who do not believe in such entities. Any specific religion: Atheists do not have a specific stance on religions but recognize them as cultural and historical phenomena. Politics: While some atheists may engage in political discourse, they do so defensively when religious groups attempt to legislate their beliefs.

Conclusion

Explaining the unexplained is a continuous process of scientific investigation. An atheist's approach is to remain open to new discoveries and to admit when they do not have all the answers. This stance fosters a genuine commitment to understanding the world through reason and evidence rather than relying on unverified beliefs.

The quote, “There’s something interesting that — as far as I know — we don’t yet understand. I’m sure the people who study such things will be looking into it.” effectively summarizes the atheist perspective. It is a humble and scientific approach that acknowledges the ongoing nature of human knowledge.