Exposing the Dark Side of Graduate Programs: A Scam Exposed

Introduction

Has the traditional academic model of education become compromised by fraudulent and corrupt practices? The answer is a concerning yes, as evidenced by personal experiences and academic fraud cases. This article delves into the harsh realities of graduate programs that are not just a waste of time and money but constitute a form of academic extortion. By sharing personal experiences and revealing unethical practices, the goal is to shed light on these programs that masquerade as legitimate educational institutions.

Personal Experience with Academic Extortion

My journey through the world of education took an unexpected turn when I enrolled in what should have been a prestigious program. The acclaimed Fordham Master of Science (MS) in Psychology and the less resplendent Wright State University Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Psychology were both marred by incompetence, manipulation, and fraud. The following sections detail the unpleasant experiences I endured and the lessons learned.

Reasons Why PhD Programs Can Be a Scam

The main reasons why these graduate programs can be considered scams include:

Incompetent Leadership: Programs run by leaders who lack the qualifications to evaluate and guide students effectively. Paying for subpar education is a reality. Ponzi-Scheme Structure: The initial requirements are constantly changing, often for arbitrary reasons, creating an endless cycle of frustration and financial drain. Useless Coursework: Faculty members do not adequately explain the information and then miscalculate grades, leading to further financial loss for the students.

These issues were not isolated instances but systemic problems that I encountered throughout my graduate studies.

The Experience at Wright State University

At Wright State University, I enrolled in a PhD program in Psychology, only to find a breeding ground for fraud and corruption. The experience was a nightmare, as details of this scam will reveal.

Academic Extortion by Kevin Bennett

One incident that stands out was with my advisor, Kevin Bennett. My enrollment was deliberately complicated and irritating, a clear plaything for him. He saw me leaving the campus one day and commented with a dripping sarcasm, 'Is the game over?' This was a crude reference to his attempt to make me feel unwelcome and end my enrollment. Bennett’s behavior was emblematic of the toxic leadership present in these institutions.

Systematic Discrimination and Misogyny

My exposure to pervasive sexism, racism, and discrimination was overwhelming. Despite a diverse educational and professional background, I fell victim to blatant unfair treatment. Faculty members often dismissed my valid comments, and false accusations such as having a 'learning disability' were used to justify poor performance evaluations.

Toxic Faculty and Programs

Faculty members at Wright State were not just unqualified but also unethical. The program suffered from arbitrary and constantly changing requirements. For instance, Gary Burns, a faculty member known for his incompetence, used online stalking to make my life miserable.

The leadership at both Fordham and Wright State exhibited poor management, mismanaged funding, and false advertising. These institutions have been plagued by systemic fraud and corruption, leading to wasted time, financial loss, and lifelong regret.

Conclusion

The insidious nature of academic fraud and corruption is a stark reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability in higher education. Personal experiences and public cases should serve as a warning to prospective students and institutions alike. It is imperative to scrutinize the legitimacy of graduate programs before enrolling and to hold institutions accountable for their actions.

Key Takeaways

Academic Extortion: Programs that manipulate students through deception and unfair practices. Unethical Practices: Harassment, online stalking, and false accusations common in some graduate programs. Systemic Fraud: Incompetent leadership, poor management, and misleading advertising are pervasive issues.

By sharing these stories, we hope to contribute to a more ethical and transparent academic environment, free from the shadows of fraudulent and corrupt practices.