Exploring the Merits of Learning by Doing vs Studying
The age-old debate of whether learning by doing or traditional studying is more effective has been a subject of discussion for decades. As someone who primarily learns through practical application, I can attest to the benefits of this approach, but it's essential to recognize that both methods have their unique advantages and limitations.
The Concepts of Learning
In addressing the duality of this question, it is evident that studying precedes doing. Even for seemingly simple tasks such as learning to ride a bicycle, some initial contemplation is necessary, even if only for a brief moment. And of course, practicing by riding the bike is an essential step. Additionally, when the subject matter is not practical and cannot be immediately applied, one can engage in reflective practices such as writing. So, after studying a sub-chapter, take a short walk, allowing your mind to digest the data, and then write down what you still remember about it. Describe how you understand it and why it is significant to the whole subject. This will likely prompt you to review what you have read before, with the advantage of already being familiar with it. Writing serves as a form of active engagement, reinforcing the learning process by consolidating the concepts that have been studied.
The Effectiveness of Learning by Doing
Active Engagement:
This method involves hands-on experiences, which can lead to a deeper understanding and retention of information. Engaging in practical tasks allows learners to see the real-world application of theories, making the learning process more meaningful and memorable. Active engagement also fosters critical thinking and problem-solving skills, as learners must apply their knowledge in real-time situations.
Practical Skills:
Learning by doing is particularly effective for developing practical skills, especially in fields such as trades, sciences, and arts, where real-world application is critical. For example, a chef can learn cooking techniques through hands-on practice, and an engineer can develop problem-solving skills through designing and building projects. Practical application enhances understanding and ensures that learners can translate theory into practice.
Immediate Feedback:
Learners can receive direct feedback from their actions, allowing for quick adjustments and improvements. This immediate feedback loop is crucial for understanding and refining skills. It also helps learners to identify areas where they need to improve and adjust their approach accordingly.
Motivation:
Motivation often increases when learners see the immediate relevance of what they are doing. Practical activities can be more engaging and rewarding, leading to increased interest and enthusiasm. This motivation can be particularly important in long-term learning processes, as it helps learners to stay committed and continue their studies.
Traditional Studying
Theoretical Knowledge:
Traditional studying provides a solid foundation of theoretical concepts, which can be essential for understanding complex topics. This method is particularly useful in subjects that require a deep understanding of foundational principles, such as mathematics, physics, and biology. Theoretical knowledge is the backbone of many advanced studies and provides a framework for further exploration.
Structured Learning:
Structured learning offers a well-organized approach to learning, which can be beneficial for certain subjects that require a sequential understanding. Mathematics, for example, often relies on a step-by-step approach to build understanding incrementally. A structured curriculum allows learners to follow a logical progression, ensuring that they grasp each concept before moving on to the next.
Preparation for Exams:
Traditional studying methods are often aligned with formal education systems, which can be important for assessments and certifications. Students who are preparing for exams such as standardized tests, college entrance exams, and professional certifications benefit from the structured and systematic approach to learning. This method ensures that learners cover all the necessary topics and can perform well in evaluative settings.
Conclusion
Many educators advocate for a blended approach that combines both methods. For instance, studying theories followed by practical application can enhance comprehension and retention. This hybrid approach acknowledges the benefits of both methods, allowing learners to engage with the material in a way that suits their learning style and needs.
Ultimately, the best method can vary from person to person. Some individuals thrive in hands-on environments, while others may excel with more traditional study techniques. By understanding the strengths of each method, learners can choose the approach that works best for them and apply a combination of methods to achieve the best results.