Did Christine Blasey Ford Take a Polygraph Test? Unearthing the Truth
When Christine Blasey Ford's testimony during the confirmation hearings for Brett Kavanaugh dominated headlines, the question of whether she took a polygraph test arose. Here, we delve into the details surrounding this claim.
The Initial Claims and Controversy
Initially, some individuals suggested that Christine Blasey Ford should have taken a polygraph test to prove the veracity of her claims of sexual assault. One such suggestion was that she should take a 'piss test' for drugs, implying questions about her credibility beyond the assault itself.
However, the information now compiled indicates that Christine Blasey Ford did indeed take a polygraph test, and she passed it with flying colors. This passing result supports her belief that she was telling the truth about the alleged incident.
Official Polygraph Test and Its Validity
According to Christine Blasey Ford's research, she did undergo a polygraph test. The test's validity, however, has been questioned due to its short duration. Polygraph tests typically require more time to accurately measure physiological responses, making a short test possibly inconclusive.
Her ex-boyfriend, who advised her on this, mentioned that Christine knew how to manipulate the test. It is reported that she advised some of her friends on how to 'beat' the polygraph tests to get jobs with the FBI. Therefore, the authenticity of the test results may be challenged.
Voluntary and Inadmissible in Court
The fact that polygraph tests are voluntary and inadmissible in court further complicates the situation. Most defense attorneys would advise their clients against taking such tests, as there is no legal requirement to do so. Dr. Ford, as a witness during the Senate confirmation hearings, was not under trial and her interactions with Senator Brett Kavanaugh were informal. Thus, it is highly unlikely that anyone involved in the case would have suggested that she take a polygraph test.
The overwhelming majority of legal experts and organizations advise against the use of polygraph tests as they can be manipulated and do not provide a definitive basis for evidence in legal proceedings.
Alternative Excuses for Kavanaugh's Actions
Understandably, the question arises: why did Brett Kavanaugh not simply state that he did not remember the incident or that it did not occur, rather than attempting to obfuscate? Indeed, many people cannot remember co-workers from decades ago, much less individuals they encountered at high school parties where alcohol was involved.
Dr. Ford's 'lie detector test' can be interpreted as the validity of her claims being proven by the fact that Brett Kavanaugh did not dispute her account. This indirect 'test' demonstrated the strength of her testimony, as she did not face any counter-allegations. Her claims were thus validated by his silence.
Conclusion
The question of whether Christine Blasey Ford took a polygraph test is a complex one. While she did take the test, its short duration and the known expertise of her ex-boyfriend in manipulating such tests raise questions about its validity. Moreover, the advantage of taking a polygraph test is further negated by the fact that such tests are voluntary and inadmissible in court.
The testimony of Christine Blasey Ford and her alleged victim status were validated by the lack of any counternarrative from Brett Kavanaugh, highlighting the importance of his silence in supporting her claims.
About the Author
If you have further questions or need more information on this topic, feel free to reach out.